Case Briefing #4: Denney v. Reppert
The plaintiff Denney works at the First State Bank of Eu assert, Kentucky, where a robbery had taken place. There was an award placed for the block up of the bank robbers. The plaintiff, as well as 3 otherwise coworkers, had supplied enough info to the guard officer which had led to the gravel of the bank robbers. Two of the arresting officers were state policeman and the thirdly officer involved was the defendant from the neighboring county. All 7 individuals, including the bank employees, and the 3 police officers claimed the award.
The royal court established that only one police officer (the defendant) is authorize to the award.
Points of View:
The Bank employees believe that the information they provided to the police officers whizz to the arrest of the bank robbers and that they were entitle to the award.
The practice of law officers who arrested the bank robbers in like manner believed that they were entitle to the award as well.
In a publics eye, bank employees are highly ethical people who should protect the money, people, and businesses as well as the deposits in the bank. It is their responsibility to provide information to the law enforcement to protect the assets people have deposited in the bank.
Police officers, when on duty, are obligated to protect the union and the people. The community in return gives them a praise and admiration for their fearlessness and heroism.
I agree with this statement as well. There is no doubt that I have special trust in people who work in banks and/or respect the police officers for the job they do. I think that they should not be empower to the award for arresting the robbers because they were at work when it happened.
What is pre-existent Obligations?
Under the common law, the law does not regard the exertion of, or the promise to perform a preexisting sound duty, public or...If you want to get a full essay, rate it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper