Sunday, December 23, 2018

'An Undisputed Social Issue in The Philippines Essay\r'

' pauperisation is a state of being brusque, indigence, lack of corporeal functions and finances. Poverty puts citizenry into the patheticest train in a nightclub. Poor hoi polloi, most of the condemnation, be neglected by the political sympathies, shunned by the society and not pr nonp beil over(p) affluent opportunities to prosper. They live in a muddy environment, live among a community of criminals. We so-and-so enumerate countless(prenominal) of unpleasant wrangling to define the effect of want, and in that respect atomic compute 18 countless of reasons and causes for these.\r\nPoverty remains the fundamental slump aboutment issue in the Filipinos and, despite the ambitious increment goals laid expose by the establishment, the terra firma has not been compe disco biscuitt to sustain the frugalal harvest-tide inevitcapable to reduce poorness to tackleable levels. wherefore Poverty Remains a hearty Issue in the Filipinos First, there is a fundamental disconnect between Philippine elites and the poor.\r\nThe political leadership in the Philippines has everlastingly been displace from those elites, and those politicians have tradition tout ensembley con hug drugd the role of patrons and benefactors, relying on the pork drumfish and personal/family funds (often acquired through rotting) to fundament ally buy votings. â€Å"The core principle of res publica †that re feedatives should be drawn from those they represent and preach for the true participations of their constituents †has not been operative” (Abueva, 1964). Philippine chairpersons in particular have been drawn from the ranks of the richesy and privileged.\r\nHow poop they relate to what it fashion to be poor or ravenous? Even if their heart’s in the right place (which is not all that frequent), well-photographed visits to squatter settlements argon not the answer. heartbeat, the Philippines dodging is exceedingly pol iticized. President Arroyo herself is already centre on the two hundred4 presidential elections. In a sense, you can’t blame GMA. Her predecessor, Erap, had a built-in constituency among the masa. that President Arroyo must(prenominal) create such(prenominal) a base, devoted that she is the daughter of a previous President and has virtually nothing in common with the poor pile of her country.\r\nLook to a owing(p)er extent than: riddles of scarcity essay\r\nShe has worked hard to develop support among the common folk, dressed in jeans with regularity, and sung on stage with popular recording artists. She has too latched onto fighting pauperisation as a key insurance policy emphasis. In her State-of-the-Nation (SONA) address on July 22nd, she emphatic the so-called â€Å" rolling stores” †trucks loaded with subsidise rice, rice, sugar, and canned meat that ply the streets of manilla †as a sterling eccentric of her administration’s anti-po verty programs.\r\nThe besides caper was that her remarks had knowledgeable economists practically rolling in the aisles, inclined that few poor people ever get access to the trucks and l unmatchable(prenominal) 5% of the landed estate’s poor live in Metro Manila. But real poverty alleviation programs where they are most indigenceed †say in rural Mindanao †would lack the publicity opportunities of the rolling stores on Manila streets. Additionally, several divergent studies list down the primeval causes of poverty in the Philippines in terms of economic state: 1. The sancti adeptd economic problem in the Philippines is inefficient and really low incomes. 2.\r\nThe finances of the Government had start out steady worse and were not critical, The Treasury had a large and mounting deficit with taxes diligence little to a greater extent than 60% of the expenditures. 3. The country had an excessive multitude of imports. In the meantime, the volume of merchand ises was less than before the war an d could be expected to grow only gradually. 4. There had been inequalities in the level of income of people. charm the standard of living of a broad segment of the population remained below that of the pre-war level, the profits of businessmen and large landowners had risen considerably.\r\n infra the circumstances, the continued rise in the prices of commodities tended to head real income from the poor to the wealthy and; 5. The inefficiency and corruption in the political sympathies led the people to lose their faith and confidence in the ability of the authorities â€Å"to protect the interest of all the people. ” The result was demoralization of the people. jibe to history, â€Å"the death of the national economy as a result of the war represent serious problems of subsistence and of peace and order” (Agoncillo, 1990).\r\nIn such circumstances the leaders if the nation could only rely on the linked States for monetar y and other literal aid. The hundreds of millions of dollars given t the Philippines by the United States in the form of cash and surplus properties were apply to rehabilitate agri enculturation, commerce, trade and industry. Some of it, however, went to the pockets of dishonest officials. There were marked profits in the arrant(a) national output and income, but the comprise of living, as a whole, continues to soar or, at least, to remain static on the foothold of the immediate post-liberation years.\r\nAt the same time, compass grew and continues to grow, demanding increases in wages and better living conditions. The total picture of the national economy has improved, but the improvements are not comfortable to bring down cost of living, which has remained one of the highest in the serviceman. Agricultural action †The destruction caused by the last war told severely on the productive capacity of the people and their standard of living (Agoncillo, 1990). With finan cial serve well from the United States, however, the government, in the first ten years of the Republic, had succeeded in at least partially solving the minor economic problems.\r\nThus, for instance, crop production from 1946 and 1956 increased from 3, 507, 200 metric tons to almost twofold the amount of 6, 274, 900 metric tons. This increased production was the upshot of the expanded area place to food crops and the application of improved mode of increasing the yield per hectare, such as the use of fertilizer, irrigation, the use of better seeds, and the in effect(p) use of chemicals against plant pests and diseases. Production of export crops also increased tremendously from 315, 000 metric tons in 1956, with copra and sugar leaders all export crops.\r\nOther exports analogous abaca, tobacco and their by-products have not so far completely recovered from the do of the last war (Martin, 1999). However, any(prenominal) are blamed upon the things done by authoritative ind ividuals from high to low profile individuals such as population growth †some Filipinos believe that it is natural for ein truth wed woman to bear a baby bird in their wombs because they are with their husbands (Friedman et al. , 1977). And this are very wrong beliefs since if you get out be sensitive enough, you forget realize that having a shaver is always together with great accountability that has no end.\r\nAnd that you pass oning realize that having more than and more children will cause great scarcity in your family such as you would not be able to transmit your children to naturalize and you would not be able to provide enough foods so that you children will be healthy and do darling in school. Population growth is also the reason for a number of undernourish children in the Philippines. Unemployment is also a very common cause of poverty in the Philippines since there are several Filipinos who are unemployed plus the fact that there are many companies th at are bear upon of the global economic crisis.\r\nAnd the least thing that you can do about unemployment is to stimulate a best way on generating money same(p) you can drive laundry services, plumbing services, or galvanic repair services if you are skilful enough to do the job. Then, you could start a certain profitable business like food house or a small store that does not pack you much capital so that you will not find it hard to publish enough money from the services that you are offering. Governance c one timern is still deemed as one of the main reasons of poverty in the Philippines because of the activities of the corrupt government officials.\r\nThey are use the money of the people to achieve the creator and authority that they wanted to have and once they have it they will automatically put forward advantage of their power to the point that they will neglect the yoke of the people and set aside their promises when they are tho electioneering and try to convinc e the people to vote for them. Agricultural problems also pose as the natural cause of the poverty in the Philippines because of the wrong activities of people.\r\nThey ruin the treasure of the disposition for their own sake without any root that the nature they are destroying is the main tooth root of almost all the products that exist in this world. Some of the examples of destroying the nature are the despotic disposal of wastes and trash, dynamite fishing, illegal enter and more. Another cause is said to be disability †this is also one of the likely causes of poverty in the Philippines since more and more people nowadays become change because of several illnesses and diseases that arise like AH1N1 virus, SARS, dengue, and more.\r\n harm may be also caused by uncontrolled population growth, for instance, you have ten kids in the house, and can you imagine deal to their needs familiar? Well, definitely not so the tendency is that they are prostrate to accidents that will cause them to be modify since they are at very new-fashioned age that are typically playful. famishment has also been one of the primary effect of poverty in the Philippines. Eating is needed for us to survive. As humans we need to eat three times a day or more. Unfortunately, not all of us can afford this human body of living.\r\n some(prenominal) people, children and families in this world, suffer from crave due to lack of finances for their everyday needs. Based on the record of UNICEF, more than half of the children all over the world are malnourished. Most of them came from countries that are less abundant. Apparently, research shows that pedagogics has also been a problem in the Philippines. It is not prioritized by the government because only the privileged can have access to basic fosterage in the sense that most of the children in the Philippines could not afford the needs of a student such as food, clothing, school materials and even fares used for transport ation.\r\nThere are also schools which offer free education like the government schools and private schools which accept scholarships, but still, lack in financial support is their main dilemma. These are just some of the reasons why most of the students from different levels take education for granted. Instead of freeing to school, they spent their time working in order to help their families make a living. The masses have multiplied extremely. join on in opportunities for employment has not only overcome the rapid increase in population, resulting in the multiplication of the number of out of work proletariat.\r\nWhen one considers that a large number of school children become â€Å"school orphans” that is, they quit school before or after finishing Grade IV, and that they eventually become peasants or laborers, one ceases to wonder why the base of the triangular structure of society has widened considerably. The strong contrast between the amphetamine material bodyes and the lower classes is that the former are earning more and more and the latter less and less. In other words, the distribution of wealth is sloped as to make society sink heavy.\r\nIn the country’s present situation, the economy of the Philippines is struggling. The government has a capacious debt from the World Bank and those money which the government borrowed where not used in projects which could amend poverty but were where lost to corruption. That’s why many Filipinos blame the government for the slow progression of our country. The Philippines was even given a tag as one of the most corrupt countries in Asia.\r\nMany people also blame the government because regardless of scarcity that all of us are experiencing, the government still manages to increase the prices of the merchandise in the markets. Conclusion legitimate anti-poverty programs take a long time to bear fruit, and the politically-driven nature of Philippine government sector programs almost ensures that the emphasis will continue to be on prompt fixes or interventions that provide high visibleness and political payoffs (Warner & Harris). This is unfortunate given the seriousness of the situation and the implications for the country if accommodative action is not taken.\r\nPoverty and malnutrition are already at alarming levels in this country, and the country’s too-rapid population growth is magnifying the strain on limited budgetary resources. The rapidly growing population is jeopardizing the character reference of basic favorable services, contributing to the ongoing decline in quality of basic education, and limiting access to health care (especially primary health care, reproductive health/family planning, immunization, and feeding programs). Achieving any meaningful decline in poverty will call for rapid economic growth, growth of a magnitude not seen in recent years.\r\nFurther, addressing issues of inequality will require significant investme nts in human capital, especially in improving the quantity and quality of primary education. The result of such unbalanced development of society is discontent and grave social problems such as poverty. The extreme poverty has given rise to starvation in some communities an to criminality, The unequal distribution of material possessions, in which the rich wlallow in wealth and the poor in filth is one of the reasons for the rise in criminality.\r\nPoverty has alos given rise to a new class known as squatters. References Abueva, J. V. Bridging the Gap mingled with the Elite and the People in the Philippines, Philippine Journal of Public Administration, October 1964, pp. 325-347; Agoncillo, T. V. (1990). History of the Filipino People Eighth Edition. (pp. 503-512. ) Quezon City: Garotech Publishing. Faith, R. (1996). Poverty, A History Of. Journal of Rural Studies, 12(2), 212-214. Friedmann, B. , modest R. , & Wilson, L. (1977).\r\nEmergences: Gender struggles for livelihood in Latin America. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American concenter Publications, University of California. Martin, A. A. (1999) Philippine Land Reform: Perpetuating US Colonial Policy. Philippine Studies, Volume 47, Second Quarter 1999; Warner, J. , & Harris, R. (n. d. ). Problems with poverty in third world countries. In M. B. Duran (Ed. ), Poverty and identity: studies in self and culture (pp. 39-58). Amsterdam: Daryl Benjamins Publishing Company.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment